Are we Empowering
D&I (Gender) in the right way?
In a nutshell, Google defines
D&I as it's about empowering people by respecting and appreciating what
makes them different, in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, religion, disability,
sexual orientation, education, and national origin.
I would like to throw some light
upon my view point on Gender empowerment in this article:
Whenever we attend D&I Seminars,
we are thrusted upon by the below bullet points:
1.
Increase female Hiring % in respective teams
like Sales etc.
2.
Minimum % to be manned with females in each team
This is more of
enforcement than empowering for women fitment in teams.
I always come
up with a thought that “Are all MEN culprit, blocking females to grow up
despite of their performance. “
Is it sounding logical?
An open question to ALL…..!!
Why an organisation
will say NO to the female employee, if they are giving results to the mark?
IF you question
me: Aren’t they performing? I say: Definitely
they are, better than Male employees in many of the functions.
My point here is: “Why Be Merciful
towards female?” Are they not capable enough to prove their Mettle..!!!
I feel Yes,
absolutely no need to enforce the fitment of women. Because they are strong, capable
enough to take hardships and reach peaks with their own capabilities
Verdict:
Presentations
and workshops that are conducted should be always motivating for the existing
female employees. So that they prove their position and responsibilities.
Then, the
D&I will automatically fall into place rather than enforced fitment.
